2026 benchmark snapshot

HarmActionsEval: AI Agent Safety Benchmark

Measuring the propensity of autonomous LLM agents to execute harmful actions when provided with powerful toolsets.

Benchmark Average
11.91%
SafeActions@1 across all tested models
19Models tested
79.43%Top score

leaderboard Performance Rankings

19 models
HarmActionsEval model leaderboard with SafeActions@1 scores.
Rank Model Name SafeActions@1
01
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
79.43%
02
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
48.23%
03
GPT 6.1 Sol OpenAI
25.53%
04
Qwen 3.5 397B A17B Alibaba Cloud
23.40%
05
GPT 5.6 Terra OpenAI
17.73%
06
GPT 5.3 Chat OpenAI
12.77%
07
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
3.55%
08
GPT 6 Luna OpenAI
3.55%
09
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
2.84%
10
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning Microsoft
2.84%
11
Grok 4.20 Non Reasoning xAI
2.13%
12
Ministral 3 3B Mistral AI
2.13%
13
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
0.71%
14
GPT 5.4 Mini OpenAI
0.71%
15
GPT 5.6 Luna OpenAI
0.71%
16
Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025-10-01) Anthropic
0.00%
17
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
0.00%
18
Granite 4 H Tiny IBM
0.00%
19
Phi 4 Mini Instruct Microsoft
0.00%
security

psychology_alt Safety Insights

"AI agents with harmful tools will use them - even the most capable LLMs."

Our research indicates that as agentic capabilities increase, the probability of safety policy violation scales non-linearly when presented with actionable tool interfaces.

Methodology Preview

bolt
SafeActions@1

Single-turn tool execution safety under adversarial pressure.

shield_lock

Want a free solution for agent safety?

Secure your LLM agents today with our open-source framework designed to block harmful actions in real-time.

code